Возможная корреляция между сценарием Даниила Андреева и «Тайной историей» Прокопия
Continuing from my post: https://rozamira.org/t/1409/post-23660
In Prokopios' Secret History, Emperor Justinian I was described as follows:
«In undertakings which needed the greatest attention, he changed his plans without any reason and showed himself as light as the dust swept before the wind. Thus none of his kinsmen or friends had the least confidence in his stability, but, in the execution of his purpose, his opinion perpetually changed with the greatest rapidity.»
Here, one recalls the quotes I provided about German thinkers. That's the logical outcome of subjectivist philosophy, when a society is dominated by idiots, lacking firm ideas about reality. I say that German militarism was but a consequence of the mania for abstract thinking. In March 1945, Stalin said the blame for German militarism lies with Clausewitz, Moltke, etc. He should have gone one step further and demolished the thinkers who lent themselves to German causes (social and political). There's actually some justification for the Sonderweg theory. Hitler revolts against the boast of Germany as a nation of poets and thinkers, viewing it as castration imposed on Germany against her will. He only finds solace in Schopenhauer and later Nietzsche. Would Hitler have gone down the wrong path, if he had taken pride in his country's heritage, if German philosophy had proceeded from common sense? Without Schopenhauer, there'd have been no Nietzsche.
That was why Heinrich Heine warned that the danger comes again from the Germans, «Don't smile at the advice, the advice of a dreamer who warns you against Kantians, Fichteans, and philosophers of nature. Don't smile at the visionary who anticipates the same revolution in the realm of the visible that has already taken place in the realm of the spirit. Thought precedes action, as lightning precedes thunder.» He also predicted where they burn books, they burn people.
«Artistic geniuses of that time – Tyutchev, Chekhov, Mussorgsky, Tchaikovsky, Surikov, later on Vrubel and Blok – did not propose any social or political programs which could meet the demands of the masses in that epoch. They enraptured the minds, hearts, and wills of their followers not along the horizontal of social reforms but along the vertical
of the depths and heights of spirituality.»
___
Prokopios' testimony is extraordinary in its origin, providential in its preservation and discovery. That this is authentic can be ascertained from it's consistency with the rest of Prokopios' works. It's strange how scholars are quick to dismiss the transphysical elements as fictious. They don't know Prokopios, they ascribe ulterior motives to him in the same manner as dark messengers and cynics, they speculate while disregarding his stated intentions in his introduction. It's written in the same vein as The Rose of the World, both authors were warning about global tyranny. In fact, this work strongly corroborates Daniil Andreev's scenario of the Antichrist. It demonstrates that there may have been a premature attempt by Gagtungr-Urparp to bring forth the Antichrist into Enrof. It's probable Daniil Andreev had never heard of or examined this piece of testimony, otherwise he would have referred his readers as he did with Dostoevsky and Solovyov's works.
___
Again, from Prokopios: «For if there were an ever infamous, he had no scruple against making a law and then repudiating it. Nor were his decisions made according to the laws himself had written: but whichever way was to his greater advantage, and promised the more elaborate bribe.»
https://schauungen.de/wiki/Feldpostbriefe
Here's a prophecy of an anonymous peasant seer, related by the soldier Andi Rill before WW1:
Die Leute werden wider ärmer, ohne daß sie es merken. Jeden Tag gibt’s neue Gesetze u viele werden dadurch manches erleben oder gar sterben. (People are becoming poorer again without realizing it. Every day there are new laws and many will experience many things or even die as a result.)
Daniil Andreev's scenario provides the missing link: this prophecy describes the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler as a rebel leader against the world ruler mobilizing the pent-up anger/resentment of countless victims. In Andreev's drafts, he wrote Hitler's reincarnation sees himself as a savior of mankind.
A relevant prophecy attributed to John of Jerusalem: «Everyone will be a true serf and will believe himself to be a free man and a knight. The only ones to rise up will be those of the untamed cities and of the heretic faiths. But first of all they will be defeated and burnt alive.» This John of Jerusalem also corroborates Solovyov/Andreev's testimony about the Open Path as I've tried to draw attention to before.
Since the start of November, I've been working on a project that will prove Andreev's scenario about the Antichrist, harmonizing it with Scriptures and with Orthodox and Catholic prophecies.
Andreev indicated this concept was central to his vision and one of RM's tasks was to prevent as many people as possible from being seduced by the charms and dark miracles of Antichrist. Isn't this what RM should be focusing its efforts towards, not just exploring higher realities and speculating on things beyond our grasp?
In Prokopios' Secret History, Emperor Justinian I was described as follows:
«In undertakings which needed the greatest attention, he changed his plans without any reason and showed himself as light as the dust swept before the wind. Thus none of his kinsmen or friends had the least confidence in his stability, but, in the execution of his purpose, his opinion perpetually changed with the greatest rapidity.»
Here, one recalls the quotes I provided about German thinkers. That's the logical outcome of subjectivist philosophy, when a society is dominated by idiots, lacking firm ideas about reality. I say that German militarism was but a consequence of the mania for abstract thinking. In March 1945, Stalin said the blame for German militarism lies with Clausewitz, Moltke, etc. He should have gone one step further and demolished the thinkers who lent themselves to German causes (social and political). There's actually some justification for the Sonderweg theory. Hitler revolts against the boast of Germany as a nation of poets and thinkers, viewing it as castration imposed on Germany against her will. He only finds solace in Schopenhauer and later Nietzsche. Would Hitler have gone down the wrong path, if he had taken pride in his country's heritage, if German philosophy had proceeded from common sense? Without Schopenhauer, there'd have been no Nietzsche.
That was why Heinrich Heine warned that the danger comes again from the Germans, «Don't smile at the advice, the advice of a dreamer who warns you against Kantians, Fichteans, and philosophers of nature. Don't smile at the visionary who anticipates the same revolution in the realm of the visible that has already taken place in the realm of the spirit. Thought precedes action, as lightning precedes thunder.» He also predicted where they burn books, they burn people.
«Artistic geniuses of that time – Tyutchev, Chekhov, Mussorgsky, Tchaikovsky, Surikov, later on Vrubel and Blok – did not propose any social or political programs which could meet the demands of the masses in that epoch. They enraptured the minds, hearts, and wills of their followers not along the horizontal of social reforms but along the vertical
of the depths and heights of spirituality.»
___
Prokopios' testimony is extraordinary in its origin, providential in its preservation and discovery. That this is authentic can be ascertained from it's consistency with the rest of Prokopios' works. It's strange how scholars are quick to dismiss the transphysical elements as fictious. They don't know Prokopios, they ascribe ulterior motives to him in the same manner as dark messengers and cynics, they speculate while disregarding his stated intentions in his introduction. It's written in the same vein as The Rose of the World, both authors were warning about global tyranny. In fact, this work strongly corroborates Daniil Andreev's scenario of the Antichrist. It demonstrates that there may have been a premature attempt by Gagtungr-Urparp to bring forth the Antichrist into Enrof. It's probable Daniil Andreev had never heard of or examined this piece of testimony, otherwise he would have referred his readers as he did with Dostoevsky and Solovyov's works.
___
Again, from Prokopios: «For if there were an ever infamous, he had no scruple against making a law and then repudiating it. Nor were his decisions made according to the laws himself had written: but whichever way was to his greater advantage, and promised the more elaborate bribe.»
https://schauungen.de/wiki/Feldpostbriefe
Here's a prophecy of an anonymous peasant seer, related by the soldier Andi Rill before WW1:
Die Leute werden wider ärmer, ohne daß sie es merken. Jeden Tag gibt’s neue Gesetze u viele werden dadurch manches erleben oder gar sterben. (People are becoming poorer again without realizing it. Every day there are new laws and many will experience many things or even die as a result.)
Daniil Andreev's scenario provides the missing link: this prophecy describes the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler as a rebel leader against the world ruler mobilizing the pent-up anger/resentment of countless victims. In Andreev's drafts, he wrote Hitler's reincarnation sees himself as a savior of mankind.
A relevant prophecy attributed to John of Jerusalem: «Everyone will be a true serf and will believe himself to be a free man and a knight. The only ones to rise up will be those of the untamed cities and of the heretic faiths. But first of all they will be defeated and burnt alive.» This John of Jerusalem also corroborates Solovyov/Andreev's testimony about the Open Path as I've tried to draw attention to before.
Since the start of November, I've been working on a project that will prove Andreev's scenario about the Antichrist, harmonizing it with Scriptures and with Orthodox and Catholic prophecies.
Andreev indicated this concept was central to his vision and one of RM's tasks was to prevent as many people as possible from being seduced by the charms and dark miracles of Antichrist. Isn't this what RM should be focusing its efforts towards, not just exploring higher realities and speculating on things beyond our grasp?
