XII. Chapter 1. Formation of the Human Being of the Ennobled Image
Only the Omniscient knows the future in all its entirety and certainty. To us, it appears as an ever-ramifying chain of dilemmas. Each link in this chain is twofold: it creates a pair of mutually excluding possibilities.
We can never be absolutely sure of how humanity will deal with each of those links, of whether this or that possibility will be opted for. For example, I cannot say exactly when the Rose of the World will rise to prominence. I cannot make any claims on whether it will ever materialize either. Yet, if humanity – given a certain historical link, that is, a pair of possibilities to choose between – opts for the ascendance of the Rose of the World, soon people will invariably have to choose between one of the two possibilities. Once one of them has been chosen, the third pair will soon shape up. If the other alternative happens to be preferred, the third pair will emerge as well, albeit a different one.
The more acute the metahistorical sight, the farther it can discern this chain of ramifying dilemmas in the haze of the future.
History knows such phenomena and such personalities that had been readied by powerful hierarchies – light-filled and dark alike – so meticulously, so preemptively, with so much importance attached to them, and with so much effort hurled into their preparation that, in fact, these could not be avoided. However, the exact materialisation of such phenomena in history – whether they are followed through or interrupted, happen in accordance with the dreamed-of ideal or become distorted, and how much distortion is there if any – all this has been impossible to foresee not only by humans but also by the intellect of the higher hierarchies. That is to say, being a part of only one of the global camps precludes one from seeing the power balance of the struggling forces locked in their fateful, ultimate battle.
As early as at the turn of the twentieth century, for instance, a world war had been predetermined. Yet, whether it would be the world war or just one in a series of global military conflicts, who was going to be the victor, and what would be the exact make-up of the two coalitions – all this was known only to God. The human gaze could only discern the inevitability of a world war and a new era of great international upheavals coming alongside it. The maximum this gaze could reach was in tracking a new pair of possibilities in history if one side happened to win, with another pair shaping up in case of its opponent’s victory. Only the greatest visionaries at the time could peer into the future chain of dilemmas down to the fourth or fifth link.
Therefore, certain key events of great processes are as though “etched” into the future as predetermined junction points. Yet, there are very few of them. Besides, while materializing in history, they may assume one or another form, reach this or that degree of the intended outcome. The birth of the Planetary Logos in humanity had been predestined millennia before it actually happened in Palestine. Yet, the century and the people that were to see His birth were decided much later. The question of whether He would become victorious, that is, whether His mission was going to be accomplished in full or in part or even end in a temporary failure – all this had been hazy up until the end of the struggle marked with Judas Iscariot’s betrayal. No one, save the Omniscient, knew of the degree of the victory or the defeat, including Jesus Christ.
The mystical mind and mystical intuition gain insights of a special kind. At times, such a gaze sees faraway events not as a chain of dilemmas but as more or less isolated images that are absolutely compelling in terms of their justifiability and vividness. A host of intermediate links between our time and those images, a host of dilemmas of the near future remain unlit or only partially discernible at that. Such pictures reflect those junction points of the Future which had long been predetermined and, therefore, are unshakeable. Or, they happen to be a foresight into an alternative of the historical reality, the most probable, albeit not inevitable, or not precisely the apprehended one at the least.
The birth of Zventa-Sventana in one of the zatomises is “written in the stars”. Hence, the birth of the Rose of the World in humanity is predestined. Yet, when and how exactly, and to what extent this momentous event will be materialized is beyond us.
Our most immediate dilemma, which hangs like the sword of Damocles, is the choice between the third world war and a universal peaceful coexistence. If the war becomes unleashed, humanity will be thrown so far back, and demonic hordes will grow so powerful having feasted on heaps upon heaps of gavvakh that, over time, even the fourth world war and the physical suicide of humanity may become a possibility, or an endless chain of more local wars and coups could ensue. The ultimate unification of the world under the auspices of the American or some other witzraor is not a far-fetched scenario either. Even though the Rose of the World will emerge in humanity in the interim, perhaps, it may be just an “undercurrent”, a hardly tolerable (later totally intolerable) organization, a kind of beacon in the vault of the catacombs. Its ascendance by way of a planetwide referendum and the establishment of ethical control over the global state appear hardly feasible. The global state will enter upon the path of a global tyranny. The gap between our days and the coming of the antichrist will shorten manyfold, and its physical and, most importantly, spiritual victims will rise in equal measure.
If the choice is made in favor of peace – unfortunately, the odds of this are not great – the Rose of the World will manifest full-blown. Yet, this is just a possibility. The very emergence of the Rose of the World will have a completely different air about it: it will appear in the milieu of democratic rule established in many countries that will be gradually spreading around and engaging the best representatives of humanity into its ranks. Then the following dilemma will arise: choosing between the unification of the earth under the ethical guidance of the Rose of the World or unity based upon some other foundation, perhaps, the cosmopolitan concept of America, or any other less spiritual, less religious, and morally deficient tenets overall. If the first choice is made, the Rose of the World will rise to prominence, and there will be a green light for all its tasks to be carried out. Otherwise, it will be a barely tolerable organization having almost no influence in the wake of the third world war, the only difference being: over the period between the first and the second dilemma, it would broadly branch out, have a sizeable membership, bring forth a number of prominent figures, make an impact upon the overall cultural development, and spread its seeds across the whole face of the earth.
While accounting for the various alternatives of the future, I will focus only upon several of them so as to not become lost in their throng. I will be talking about my vision of the Rose of the World’s activities provided that a favorable resolution of the nearest dilemmas in the chain will make it possible to raise a question before humanity about the Rose of the World’s global ascendance. In order to narrow down this humongous problem without losing the focus, from now onwards I will not be touching on potential negative possibilities, that is, anything that could thwart the realization of the global tasks of the Rose of the World in the future. Let’s talk only about happy things for now! The heart is ravaged with horrors of the past and the present. Let’s light up the fibers of our souls with contemplations about the most beautiful of potentialities! Having fewer victims fall prey to the dark camp is one the chief tasks. For this to happen, humanity needs such a spiritual milieu wherein the enlightenment of the soul is to be experienced not by hundreds or thousands but by millions of individuals. This way, millions, perhaps, even billions of souls will be prevented from being enslaved by the coming antichrist, that is, from the ruinous depravation of their being and from entering upon the path of long expiatory sufferings afterwards.
If one sets such a goal, a certain program of actions will inevitably emanate from it. This program comprises a host of tasks to be solved step by step or in parallel to one another. For this reason, I would like to recall the foremost tasks of the Rose of the World: the cultivation of the human being of the ennobled image; establishing universal material wellbeing; helping humanity develop the highest capacities and tap into light-filled creativity; consolidating the efforts of all light-oriented teachings; the transformation of the planet into a garden and the Global Federation of States – into the Brotherhood.
Among these tasks, there is one, which the Rose of the World can embark upon long before its rise to prominence. The reason being: laying the foundations for this new, most spiritualized education system does not require global supervision over all schools on the planet. A new education will be able to form in certain individual education institutions run by the Rose of the World. It can have such establishments at its disposal even while at the level of a religio-charitable organization in any truly democratic country with all its freedoms coming alongside. The experience accumulated in the course of such a preparatory stage would be later extrapolated onto the universal formative education. When I was talking about the communistic education system, I highlighted some of its most seminal achievements, albeit trimmed-down and depreciated with a host of educational-ideological switches. These included character-building, development of willpower, honesty, the sense of camaraderie, courage, resilience, cheerfulness, and high-mindedness. The human being of the ennobled image will certainly be courageous and strong-willed. Yet, unlike being poured into the struggle of some collective to spread its hegemony over all other collectives, his or her courage and willpower are going to be channeled into activities relating, first and foremost, to self-development, then to the conditions conducive to someone else’s character-building, and, finally, toward the perfection of others in an uncoercive environment filled with love. These activities will be aimed at the unification of humanity without bloodshed, toward lessening the sufferings of all living beings, increasing the total sum of love and happiness in humanity, and bringing about the state of harmony to all living beings inhabiting the Enrof of our planet. Such a person cannot but feature high honesty and a full-blown sense of camaraderie. Lies are justified only when one takes someone else’s sufferings upon himself or herself or tries to keep someone away from danger. Yet, divulgation of someone’s secret, giving away a comrade, or a denunciation, however nicely clothed, will remain the most shameful of betrayals in the eyes of such a person. His or her soul cannot help being cheerful, too. Yet, such cheerfulness is far from a contrived optimism that would dodge any inkling of the dark side of life, or the sorrow and gloom of certain worlds, or future dangers. All phenomena of life and culture will be assessed, regardless of its optimistic or pessimistic bearing, as per its capacity to broaden or to narrow down the spectrum of personality, to elevate or debase the soul, and, ultimately, to contribute to love and freedom or hatred and enslavement. Such a spirit is courageous enough to be looking into the eyes of any monster and has developed enough spiritually to love life not “as is”, but as it has been preconceived in the worlds of ascent or in the future enlightened Enrof.
The cultivation of the ability to be creative in any kind of work is going to be one of the essential tasks of education. If the need for creativity does not become an inalienable quality of the personality, then this will be fraught with satiation, apathy, and the paralysis of spirit in the milieu of the universal wellbeing and ever-decreasing working hours. Yet, one has to be prepared to significantly revise the utility and justifiability of one or another type of work in terms of its degree of creativity. Any however creative work aimed at multiplying the sufferings of living beings – whether it be the invention of the murderous means or in the publishing of depraving books, or in killing animals just for fun’s sake, out of gluttony or so-called “scientific expediency” – all such work will be seen as an atavism, as something abominable and shameful. On the contrary: many forms of the inner work that have been looked down upon as a mere idleness will come to be rightly appreciated. Contemplation; meditation; all kinds of religious activities; communion with nature; the development of the physique through much more versatile forms than offered now in sports; excursions and pilgrimages to great hotbeds and memorials of culture; engaging, however humbly, in literature and art; creative love between man and woman; spiritually enriching friendships – all this will attest to the sparkle of the blessed and necessary genuine inner work that will require honorable, fulfilling hours instead of meager bits of leisure time. As long as the work is conducive to the deepening, broadening, elevation, or ennoblement of one individual at the least, it is bound to add to the perfection of the world. Should the overarching drive stem from egotistical pleasure-seeking, the unrelenting psychological war will be waged against the dominance of such a drive – it is an axiomatic truth that a person living just for himself or herself makes not even a naught but a negative value in the wellbeing of humanity. Perhaps, it goes without saying that the drive for knowledge is an incentive to be roundly and thoroughly developed. Yet, this drive will not be narrowed down by the compass of knowledge obtainable through scientific and artistic pursuits alone – it will also include metahistorical, transphysical, and religious fields. Not only the thirst for knowledge is going to be developed, but also, the thirst for the spirit in general.
The communist education, which I have passingly touched upon, was keen on developing three more qualities of utmost importance: the submission of the personal to the collective, the spirit of internationalism, and an aspiration for the future.
Let us not dwell on how successfully these qualities were instilled in the generations, which had been nurtured by the system’s workers. Be that as it may, the system was adamant on inculcating its subjects with the sense of collectivity as overriding any individualism. Unfortunately, two ideological switches had been insensibly pulled. “The collective” did not mean humanity overall or even the populace of one or several countries. Rather, it was a part of humanity unified with a strictly delineated ideology. Everything outside its domain was seen either as “enemies” – and these should not have expected any mercy – or as temporary allies whose destiny was to be decided in the future: either they were to join “us” and be included into the growing belligerent collectivity or turned into enemies, hence to be wiped out. Thus was the first switch: switching communality with groupism. The second switch was about losing the sense of proportion: minuscule, pitiable collective benefits coming from the self-renunciation of individuals were deemed higher than personal interests, even, at times, lives. A petty transgression was seen as a state crime, whereas the natural human unwillingness to become separated from the family for long, all for the sake of many years of labor in a remote and barely reachable periphery, was met with a great many barriers piled up by the state, party, and society. A new attitude between the individual and the collective was to eliminate these switches. A group, state, or social movement interest must not dominate over individual interests by default – essentially, such collective tyrants are vampires, idols, and Molochs. Rather, the wellbeing of the whole humanity is to be given the pride of place. Some would object along the lines that humanity is not monolithic, that it is divided into antagonistic classes, etc. Indeed, it is divided. But its genuine wellbeing precisely comes down to having been united – not by way of truncating some parts and forcibly remolding other parts but through the development of centripetal forces and in the ridding of centrifugal forces in humanity. This unity is not to come at a cost of yet another hundreds of millions of violent deaths, of even the greater sum of personal tragedies and the turning of a part of humanity into prisoners. No matter how opportune, there must be this reminder that my generation did burn its fingers on these switches and lies. I will keep hammering on about this, opportunely or not, for as long as my admonishments reach at least a few minds and hearts, even those who are yet to be born – eventually, they too are going to come to live and create. In sum, only understood in this light, the collective has enough reasons to claim its superiority over the individual. Yet, even this superiority cannot be absolute, for the right correlation is what matters, too: great sacrifices on the part of the individual are to be made for great goals, and vice versa. Deception, however, was quick to have crept in even here: the thought that all peoples are equal in terms of their temperament, giftedness, and historical “oughtness” is a sheer demagogy. It goes without saying that there is no single or several peoples specially preselected by the Deity to enjoy some special privilege and right. Yet, each people has been providentially destined or chosen, if you will, for solving some singular historical and cultural tasks; these missions are inimitably idiosyncratic. There are peoples – normally, they are quite populous – which are predestined to play colossal roles of planetary significance; others have more specific and particular goals. Yet: To whom more is committed, from him more is required. Special giftedness is to lead to being more self-demanding rather than tough on others, and this concerns both individuals and peoples alike. Giftedness and stature entitle one to greater deeds rather than to the enjoyment of more rights than other mortals. All in all, exceptionalism does not give one any special rights; rather, it presupposes an extra load of duties.
Precisely this kind of understanding inherently refutes any racialist or nationalistic ideas.
At the same time, when we hear claims to the effect that a small and backward people that has made virtually no contribution to the treasury of humanity stands on equal footing with the Chinese, British, German, or Indian people, this sounds unconvincing and absurd, for such a thesis cannot be supported with any self-evident, irrefutable facts. The true rebuttal for racism, along with any other superhuman claim – coming from an individual or a people alike – comes down to the “noblesse oblige”, that is, nobility toward those less privileged. Would anybody except for ethically barbarian individuals justify the exploitation of the poor by the rich and of the weak by the strong? Only ethical barbarians may presume that higher ethical giftedness and power may entitle one to the exploitation of cultural “minors”. Sadly, hypocritical blubber about the so-called “white man’s burden” proved to be yet another sham. If the white man’s burden really exists, it is not about colonizing others. Rather, it is a burden of highly refined beings obligated to enlighten the ignorant, feed the hungry, bring joy to those distraught, heal the ailing, uplift those lagging behind, illumine, beautify, and mollify their lives. This makes the real burden of a great nation!
It is clear that no nationalistic drivel can sprout on the spiritual fields hallowed by the blue petals of the Rose of the World.
There remains yet the third feature of the old education system, that is, aspiring for the future – a great one! This feature is characteristic of the people brought up by this system. Such an individual thinks futuristically. He or she dreams of and believes in a bright new world, is inspired toward the wellbeing of the future generations, and is a stranger to egotistical aloofness. Although this aspiration for the future is a huge stride forward, it is not without flaws. The Doctrine has suffused this notion of the future with a downgraded and simplified content. Basically, two values make up this notion: material prosperity and the subjugation of nature. Such a notion is as linear as a T-square. It is as devoid of spirituality, as concrete and materialistically naïve, as the utterances of a seventh-grader sitting by the bonfire. True, the prospect of the future does presuppose material wellbeing and, ultimately, prosperity. Yet, the universal wellbeing can be reached relatively soon, it is just the first stage, only a preliminary condition toward mental and spiritual blossoming. In the twenty-first century, people will be taking delight in this wellbeing or prosperity, paying attention to it, and experiencing it emotionally as little as a modern resident of New York or Moscow barely takes notice of, for example, sewerage or bus service. People of the next century will be just using material wellbeing, and later prosperity – just that. As for the notion of the subjugation of nature, an aggressive, imperialist, and nearly colonialist stance as it is, it will be counterweighted with the idea of harmonizing the interconnection between humans and the natural world. Once having become acutely aware of nature’s duality, its providential and demonic principles, people will interfere into the life of nature such that its demonism will be being grappled with, and its light-filled aspect will have a close interpenetration with humans. The latter will take interest not just in extracting newer upon newer natural resources, but also in seeing to the spiritual development of the animal kingdom, the harmonizing of the relationships across species, perfecting the plant kingdom and the entire natural landscape, and establishing relationships of love and friendship with the elementals of light.
We can never be absolutely sure of how humanity will deal with each of those links, of whether this or that possibility will be opted for. For example, I cannot say exactly when the Rose of the World will rise to prominence. I cannot make any claims on whether it will ever materialize either. Yet, if humanity – given a certain historical link, that is, a pair of possibilities to choose between – opts for the ascendance of the Rose of the World, soon people will invariably have to choose between one of the two possibilities. Once one of them has been chosen, the third pair will soon shape up. If the other alternative happens to be preferred, the third pair will emerge as well, albeit a different one.
The more acute the metahistorical sight, the farther it can discern this chain of ramifying dilemmas in the haze of the future.
History knows such phenomena and such personalities that had been readied by powerful hierarchies – light-filled and dark alike – so meticulously, so preemptively, with so much importance attached to them, and with so much effort hurled into their preparation that, in fact, these could not be avoided. However, the exact materialisation of such phenomena in history – whether they are followed through or interrupted, happen in accordance with the dreamed-of ideal or become distorted, and how much distortion is there if any – all this has been impossible to foresee not only by humans but also by the intellect of the higher hierarchies. That is to say, being a part of only one of the global camps precludes one from seeing the power balance of the struggling forces locked in their fateful, ultimate battle.
As early as at the turn of the twentieth century, for instance, a world war had been predetermined. Yet, whether it would be the world war or just one in a series of global military conflicts, who was going to be the victor, and what would be the exact make-up of the two coalitions – all this was known only to God. The human gaze could only discern the inevitability of a world war and a new era of great international upheavals coming alongside it. The maximum this gaze could reach was in tracking a new pair of possibilities in history if one side happened to win, with another pair shaping up in case of its opponent’s victory. Only the greatest visionaries at the time could peer into the future chain of dilemmas down to the fourth or fifth link.
Therefore, certain key events of great processes are as though “etched” into the future as predetermined junction points. Yet, there are very few of them. Besides, while materializing in history, they may assume one or another form, reach this or that degree of the intended outcome. The birth of the Planetary Logos in humanity had been predestined millennia before it actually happened in Palestine. Yet, the century and the people that were to see His birth were decided much later. The question of whether He would become victorious, that is, whether His mission was going to be accomplished in full or in part or even end in a temporary failure – all this had been hazy up until the end of the struggle marked with Judas Iscariot’s betrayal. No one, save the Omniscient, knew of the degree of the victory or the defeat, including Jesus Christ.
The mystical mind and mystical intuition gain insights of a special kind. At times, such a gaze sees faraway events not as a chain of dilemmas but as more or less isolated images that are absolutely compelling in terms of their justifiability and vividness. A host of intermediate links between our time and those images, a host of dilemmas of the near future remain unlit or only partially discernible at that. Such pictures reflect those junction points of the Future which had long been predetermined and, therefore, are unshakeable. Or, they happen to be a foresight into an alternative of the historical reality, the most probable, albeit not inevitable, or not precisely the apprehended one at the least.
The birth of Zventa-Sventana in one of the zatomises is “written in the stars”. Hence, the birth of the Rose of the World in humanity is predestined. Yet, when and how exactly, and to what extent this momentous event will be materialized is beyond us.
Our most immediate dilemma, which hangs like the sword of Damocles, is the choice between the third world war and a universal peaceful coexistence. If the war becomes unleashed, humanity will be thrown so far back, and demonic hordes will grow so powerful having feasted on heaps upon heaps of gavvakh that, over time, even the fourth world war and the physical suicide of humanity may become a possibility, or an endless chain of more local wars and coups could ensue. The ultimate unification of the world under the auspices of the American or some other witzraor is not a far-fetched scenario either. Even though the Rose of the World will emerge in humanity in the interim, perhaps, it may be just an “undercurrent”, a hardly tolerable (later totally intolerable) organization, a kind of beacon in the vault of the catacombs. Its ascendance by way of a planetwide referendum and the establishment of ethical control over the global state appear hardly feasible. The global state will enter upon the path of a global tyranny. The gap between our days and the coming of the antichrist will shorten manyfold, and its physical and, most importantly, spiritual victims will rise in equal measure.
If the choice is made in favor of peace – unfortunately, the odds of this are not great – the Rose of the World will manifest full-blown. Yet, this is just a possibility. The very emergence of the Rose of the World will have a completely different air about it: it will appear in the milieu of democratic rule established in many countries that will be gradually spreading around and engaging the best representatives of humanity into its ranks. Then the following dilemma will arise: choosing between the unification of the earth under the ethical guidance of the Rose of the World or unity based upon some other foundation, perhaps, the cosmopolitan concept of America, or any other less spiritual, less religious, and morally deficient tenets overall. If the first choice is made, the Rose of the World will rise to prominence, and there will be a green light for all its tasks to be carried out. Otherwise, it will be a barely tolerable organization having almost no influence in the wake of the third world war, the only difference being: over the period between the first and the second dilemma, it would broadly branch out, have a sizeable membership, bring forth a number of prominent figures, make an impact upon the overall cultural development, and spread its seeds across the whole face of the earth.
While accounting for the various alternatives of the future, I will focus only upon several of them so as to not become lost in their throng. I will be talking about my vision of the Rose of the World’s activities provided that a favorable resolution of the nearest dilemmas in the chain will make it possible to raise a question before humanity about the Rose of the World’s global ascendance. In order to narrow down this humongous problem without losing the focus, from now onwards I will not be touching on potential negative possibilities, that is, anything that could thwart the realization of the global tasks of the Rose of the World in the future. Let’s talk only about happy things for now! The heart is ravaged with horrors of the past and the present. Let’s light up the fibers of our souls with contemplations about the most beautiful of potentialities! Having fewer victims fall prey to the dark camp is one the chief tasks. For this to happen, humanity needs such a spiritual milieu wherein the enlightenment of the soul is to be experienced not by hundreds or thousands but by millions of individuals. This way, millions, perhaps, even billions of souls will be prevented from being enslaved by the coming antichrist, that is, from the ruinous depravation of their being and from entering upon the path of long expiatory sufferings afterwards.
If one sets such a goal, a certain program of actions will inevitably emanate from it. This program comprises a host of tasks to be solved step by step or in parallel to one another. For this reason, I would like to recall the foremost tasks of the Rose of the World: the cultivation of the human being of the ennobled image; establishing universal material wellbeing; helping humanity develop the highest capacities and tap into light-filled creativity; consolidating the efforts of all light-oriented teachings; the transformation of the planet into a garden and the Global Federation of States – into the Brotherhood.
Among these tasks, there is one, which the Rose of the World can embark upon long before its rise to prominence. The reason being: laying the foundations for this new, most spiritualized education system does not require global supervision over all schools on the planet. A new education will be able to form in certain individual education institutions run by the Rose of the World. It can have such establishments at its disposal even while at the level of a religio-charitable organization in any truly democratic country with all its freedoms coming alongside. The experience accumulated in the course of such a preparatory stage would be later extrapolated onto the universal formative education. When I was talking about the communistic education system, I highlighted some of its most seminal achievements, albeit trimmed-down and depreciated with a host of educational-ideological switches. These included character-building, development of willpower, honesty, the sense of camaraderie, courage, resilience, cheerfulness, and high-mindedness. The human being of the ennobled image will certainly be courageous and strong-willed. Yet, unlike being poured into the struggle of some collective to spread its hegemony over all other collectives, his or her courage and willpower are going to be channeled into activities relating, first and foremost, to self-development, then to the conditions conducive to someone else’s character-building, and, finally, toward the perfection of others in an uncoercive environment filled with love. These activities will be aimed at the unification of humanity without bloodshed, toward lessening the sufferings of all living beings, increasing the total sum of love and happiness in humanity, and bringing about the state of harmony to all living beings inhabiting the Enrof of our planet. Such a person cannot but feature high honesty and a full-blown sense of camaraderie. Lies are justified only when one takes someone else’s sufferings upon himself or herself or tries to keep someone away from danger. Yet, divulgation of someone’s secret, giving away a comrade, or a denunciation, however nicely clothed, will remain the most shameful of betrayals in the eyes of such a person. His or her soul cannot help being cheerful, too. Yet, such cheerfulness is far from a contrived optimism that would dodge any inkling of the dark side of life, or the sorrow and gloom of certain worlds, or future dangers. All phenomena of life and culture will be assessed, regardless of its optimistic or pessimistic bearing, as per its capacity to broaden or to narrow down the spectrum of personality, to elevate or debase the soul, and, ultimately, to contribute to love and freedom or hatred and enslavement. Such a spirit is courageous enough to be looking into the eyes of any monster and has developed enough spiritually to love life not “as is”, but as it has been preconceived in the worlds of ascent or in the future enlightened Enrof.
The cultivation of the ability to be creative in any kind of work is going to be one of the essential tasks of education. If the need for creativity does not become an inalienable quality of the personality, then this will be fraught with satiation, apathy, and the paralysis of spirit in the milieu of the universal wellbeing and ever-decreasing working hours. Yet, one has to be prepared to significantly revise the utility and justifiability of one or another type of work in terms of its degree of creativity. Any however creative work aimed at multiplying the sufferings of living beings – whether it be the invention of the murderous means or in the publishing of depraving books, or in killing animals just for fun’s sake, out of gluttony or so-called “scientific expediency” – all such work will be seen as an atavism, as something abominable and shameful. On the contrary: many forms of the inner work that have been looked down upon as a mere idleness will come to be rightly appreciated. Contemplation; meditation; all kinds of religious activities; communion with nature; the development of the physique through much more versatile forms than offered now in sports; excursions and pilgrimages to great hotbeds and memorials of culture; engaging, however humbly, in literature and art; creative love between man and woman; spiritually enriching friendships – all this will attest to the sparkle of the blessed and necessary genuine inner work that will require honorable, fulfilling hours instead of meager bits of leisure time. As long as the work is conducive to the deepening, broadening, elevation, or ennoblement of one individual at the least, it is bound to add to the perfection of the world. Should the overarching drive stem from egotistical pleasure-seeking, the unrelenting psychological war will be waged against the dominance of such a drive – it is an axiomatic truth that a person living just for himself or herself makes not even a naught but a negative value in the wellbeing of humanity. Perhaps, it goes without saying that the drive for knowledge is an incentive to be roundly and thoroughly developed. Yet, this drive will not be narrowed down by the compass of knowledge obtainable through scientific and artistic pursuits alone – it will also include metahistorical, transphysical, and religious fields. Not only the thirst for knowledge is going to be developed, but also, the thirst for the spirit in general.
The communist education, which I have passingly touched upon, was keen on developing three more qualities of utmost importance: the submission of the personal to the collective, the spirit of internationalism, and an aspiration for the future.
Let us not dwell on how successfully these qualities were instilled in the generations, which had been nurtured by the system’s workers. Be that as it may, the system was adamant on inculcating its subjects with the sense of collectivity as overriding any individualism. Unfortunately, two ideological switches had been insensibly pulled. “The collective” did not mean humanity overall or even the populace of one or several countries. Rather, it was a part of humanity unified with a strictly delineated ideology. Everything outside its domain was seen either as “enemies” – and these should not have expected any mercy – or as temporary allies whose destiny was to be decided in the future: either they were to join “us” and be included into the growing belligerent collectivity or turned into enemies, hence to be wiped out. Thus was the first switch: switching communality with groupism. The second switch was about losing the sense of proportion: minuscule, pitiable collective benefits coming from the self-renunciation of individuals were deemed higher than personal interests, even, at times, lives. A petty transgression was seen as a state crime, whereas the natural human unwillingness to become separated from the family for long, all for the sake of many years of labor in a remote and barely reachable periphery, was met with a great many barriers piled up by the state, party, and society. A new attitude between the individual and the collective was to eliminate these switches. A group, state, or social movement interest must not dominate over individual interests by default – essentially, such collective tyrants are vampires, idols, and Molochs. Rather, the wellbeing of the whole humanity is to be given the pride of place. Some would object along the lines that humanity is not monolithic, that it is divided into antagonistic classes, etc. Indeed, it is divided. But its genuine wellbeing precisely comes down to having been united – not by way of truncating some parts and forcibly remolding other parts but through the development of centripetal forces and in the ridding of centrifugal forces in humanity. This unity is not to come at a cost of yet another hundreds of millions of violent deaths, of even the greater sum of personal tragedies and the turning of a part of humanity into prisoners. No matter how opportune, there must be this reminder that my generation did burn its fingers on these switches and lies. I will keep hammering on about this, opportunely or not, for as long as my admonishments reach at least a few minds and hearts, even those who are yet to be born – eventually, they too are going to come to live and create. In sum, only understood in this light, the collective has enough reasons to claim its superiority over the individual. Yet, even this superiority cannot be absolute, for the right correlation is what matters, too: great sacrifices on the part of the individual are to be made for great goals, and vice versa. Deception, however, was quick to have crept in even here: the thought that all peoples are equal in terms of their temperament, giftedness, and historical “oughtness” is a sheer demagogy. It goes without saying that there is no single or several peoples specially preselected by the Deity to enjoy some special privilege and right. Yet, each people has been providentially destined or chosen, if you will, for solving some singular historical and cultural tasks; these missions are inimitably idiosyncratic. There are peoples – normally, they are quite populous – which are predestined to play colossal roles of planetary significance; others have more specific and particular goals. Yet: To whom more is committed, from him more is required. Special giftedness is to lead to being more self-demanding rather than tough on others, and this concerns both individuals and peoples alike. Giftedness and stature entitle one to greater deeds rather than to the enjoyment of more rights than other mortals. All in all, exceptionalism does not give one any special rights; rather, it presupposes an extra load of duties.
Precisely this kind of understanding inherently refutes any racialist or nationalistic ideas.
At the same time, when we hear claims to the effect that a small and backward people that has made virtually no contribution to the treasury of humanity stands on equal footing with the Chinese, British, German, or Indian people, this sounds unconvincing and absurd, for such a thesis cannot be supported with any self-evident, irrefutable facts. The true rebuttal for racism, along with any other superhuman claim – coming from an individual or a people alike – comes down to the “noblesse oblige”, that is, nobility toward those less privileged. Would anybody except for ethically barbarian individuals justify the exploitation of the poor by the rich and of the weak by the strong? Only ethical barbarians may presume that higher ethical giftedness and power may entitle one to the exploitation of cultural “minors”. Sadly, hypocritical blubber about the so-called “white man’s burden” proved to be yet another sham. If the white man’s burden really exists, it is not about colonizing others. Rather, it is a burden of highly refined beings obligated to enlighten the ignorant, feed the hungry, bring joy to those distraught, heal the ailing, uplift those lagging behind, illumine, beautify, and mollify their lives. This makes the real burden of a great nation!
It is clear that no nationalistic drivel can sprout on the spiritual fields hallowed by the blue petals of the Rose of the World.
There remains yet the third feature of the old education system, that is, aspiring for the future – a great one! This feature is characteristic of the people brought up by this system. Such an individual thinks futuristically. He or she dreams of and believes in a bright new world, is inspired toward the wellbeing of the future generations, and is a stranger to egotistical aloofness. Although this aspiration for the future is a huge stride forward, it is not without flaws. The Doctrine has suffused this notion of the future with a downgraded and simplified content. Basically, two values make up this notion: material prosperity and the subjugation of nature. Such a notion is as linear as a T-square. It is as devoid of spirituality, as concrete and materialistically naïve, as the utterances of a seventh-grader sitting by the bonfire. True, the prospect of the future does presuppose material wellbeing and, ultimately, prosperity. Yet, the universal wellbeing can be reached relatively soon, it is just the first stage, only a preliminary condition toward mental and spiritual blossoming. In the twenty-first century, people will be taking delight in this wellbeing or prosperity, paying attention to it, and experiencing it emotionally as little as a modern resident of New York or Moscow barely takes notice of, for example, sewerage or bus service. People of the next century will be just using material wellbeing, and later prosperity – just that. As for the notion of the subjugation of nature, an aggressive, imperialist, and nearly colonialist stance as it is, it will be counterweighted with the idea of harmonizing the interconnection between humans and the natural world. Once having become acutely aware of nature’s duality, its providential and demonic principles, people will interfere into the life of nature such that its demonism will be being grappled with, and its light-filled aspect will have a close interpenetration with humans. The latter will take interest not just in extracting newer upon newer natural resources, but also in seeing to the spiritual development of the animal kingdom, the harmonizing of the relationships across species, perfecting the plant kingdom and the entire natural landscape, and establishing relationships of love and friendship with the elementals of light.