Видео о Данииле Андрееве
Иоанн, I'm aware that one must appeal to the emotions when addressing the masses. This is the psychological method, which is easier to apply in personal real life conversations, than over the Internet with random strangers. Yes, it should be elaborated on.
I'll keep your advice in mind. I erred when I made my appeal to the Bahai, I was focused on defense, expecting heavy resistance, rather than mere disinterest and silence in the room. I should have stricken the introductory paragraphs from the post.
Nieztsche once advised writers to confine their messages to no more than 10 sentences. What you wrote reminds me of a quote I read about Nietzsche:
«Unfortunately, Nietzsche (however superior he is to the man I have in mind) seems to have devoted himself chiefly to what he thought would shock the public. He is at his best when he is most unmindful of effect. His was the vanity of the mirror...» The writer suggests that Nietzsche was uncertain about himself. Perhaps this also describes our zoomer. It also describes me in a way.
On the other hand, what is the purpose of a miracle? Is it not to hold and draw people's attention? Is this not what a «holy fool» accomplishes with his antics? A Russian user told me how even in the 90s, the bandits of those days did not touch holy fools, but feared them.
A quote I picked up: «our plebs permit gladly to an eccentric, owing to their love of what is new and unusual, what they would never forgive a sage, so that his best policy is to let his wisdom appear as folly.» Let us not forget how Peter the Great loved innovation, how he was obssesed with strange/unusual things. We read in the Acts of the Apostles how the Greeks were open to Paul's message because it sounded foreign, and they were followers of the latest trend.
Here's a compliment I received from a clairvoyant lady, we never spoke again, but it seems I left a lasting impression: «But you my friend are actually hard to read which is probably what intrigued me about you in the first place. You offer insights that allow me to re-examine the world. You’re probably the first person I’ve ever actually discussed this stuff with.» As it happens, many users with transphysical experiences found it easy to open up to me about what they saw.
To a great degree, I modelled my IRL approach on what I learned about Stalin:
According to Sergo Beria, Stalin «left each person he spoke to anxious to see him again, with a sense that there was now a bond that linked them forever.», and he «knew how to listen to someone and make him feel he was important.» Khrushchev added, «Stalin was often quite attentive and sensitive, and he won over many people because of that.»
This is why we need people who are truly humane and do not make promises to the masses. «We have enough idealists who have occasional fits of idealism and tread the worm on the ground while they are looking for the stars.»
I'll keep your advice in mind. I erred when I made my appeal to the Bahai, I was focused on defense, expecting heavy resistance, rather than mere disinterest and silence in the room. I should have stricken the introductory paragraphs from the post.
Nieztsche once advised writers to confine their messages to no more than 10 sentences. What you wrote reminds me of a quote I read about Nietzsche:
«Unfortunately, Nietzsche (however superior he is to the man I have in mind) seems to have devoted himself chiefly to what he thought would shock the public. He is at his best when he is most unmindful of effect. His was the vanity of the mirror...» The writer suggests that Nietzsche was uncertain about himself. Perhaps this also describes our zoomer. It also describes me in a way.
On the other hand, what is the purpose of a miracle? Is it not to hold and draw people's attention? Is this not what a «holy fool» accomplishes with his antics? A Russian user told me how even in the 90s, the bandits of those days did not touch holy fools, but feared them.
A quote I picked up: «our plebs permit gladly to an eccentric, owing to their love of what is new and unusual, what they would never forgive a sage, so that his best policy is to let his wisdom appear as folly.» Let us not forget how Peter the Great loved innovation, how he was obssesed with strange/unusual things. We read in the Acts of the Apostles how the Greeks were open to Paul's message because it sounded foreign, and they were followers of the latest trend.
Here's a compliment I received from a clairvoyant lady, we never spoke again, but it seems I left a lasting impression: «But you my friend are actually hard to read which is probably what intrigued me about you in the first place. You offer insights that allow me to re-examine the world. You’re probably the first person I’ve ever actually discussed this stuff with.» As it happens, many users with transphysical experiences found it easy to open up to me about what they saw.
To a great degree, I modelled my IRL approach on what I learned about Stalin:
According to Sergo Beria, Stalin «left each person he spoke to anxious to see him again, with a sense that there was now a bond that linked them forever.», and he «knew how to listen to someone and make him feel he was important.» Khrushchev added, «Stalin was often quite attentive and sensitive, and he won over many people because of that.»
Being a former nationalist myself, I believe I could make an appeal to them, but I am choosing to refrain from associating with them again... They would have to be Russian nationalists this time around, neither Germans nor American. Eventually they will have to be won over or everything will be in vain because they sabotage movements that exclude them from membership. Let us not forget the type of person «Judas» represents: When his nationalistic hopes were dashed, he turned against the movement. Fanatics are the biggest menace to any movement. Illiodor turned against Rasputin. Sabaneev turned against Scriabin. Sinnett turned against Blavatsky. Why? Because their ideal, everything they believed in, were not realized.
This is why we need people who are truly humane and do not make promises to the masses. «We have enough idealists who have occasional fits of idealism and tread the worm on the ground while they are looking for the stars.»
Редактирование:
Зато разговоров про «величие России» и «отсюда хлынет свет» будет много 
