Bahai Outreach
This is a reply to Иоанн, I meant to send it last month, but I needed to take a long break from online forums/social media. I didn't find the time/energy to get around to addressing the subject over on Telegram.
I'm posting it here so I can get around to asking him about his impressions of the Bahai Faith during his visit, in preparation for a mass-appeal to the Bahai, presenting The Rose of the World in a simplified manner to their English-speaking members. I'm not sure if I'm competent enough to present The Rose of the World, but I can easily/certainly demonstrate the compatibility between their ideals with the considerable knowledge at my disposal. The joint unification of The Rose of the World and Bahai Faith (or perhaps another religion such as Hinduism) will set the precedent for the unification of all religions.
They have admitted that only a Council could establish an universal language but what they don't realize is that the universal language their Prophet desired doesn't stop at merely using human speech. This is made clear to me by some of his hints:
«enable you to be independent of others» / «most firm foundation» / «strive to translate that which hath been written into reality and action»
There exists a deeper, underlying meaning to the «first sign» he speaks about. That's where The Rose of the World can make things clearer for them. There should also be a mathematical-scientific way of communicating facts, that does away with the need to memorize strange-sounding terms entirely, and eliminates repetition. DA: «so as to avoid constantly repeating a lengthy description» This is merely an early announcement. I plan to make my appeal in summertime.
The Bahai seem to be uncertain about whether the Light Hierarchy wishes for a «world government» or «world federation». That should be made clear to them, it is the latter. Even someone like Adolf Hitler understood this, in his own narrow and short-sighted way.
I am making the preparations to present/demonstrate the reality of The Rose of the World to English-speaking audiences, in a more systematic manner (by systematic, I mean simply laying down the truth/the facts as it is, without embellishments or exaggeration. Not in the manner university graduates and professors demand, with unnecessary exposition and contextual info about the author/writer. What matters is the content/essence of the message.)
Let's not forget that Daniil Andreev found it necessary to explore the darker aspects of existence: «For without a notion of the frightful and dread demonic sakwalas, we will also be unable to gain a proper notion of the higher layers of Shadanakar.»
_____
It cannot be regarded as exaggeration because I provided the proof, facts and data for his existence. The only argument I made was that it could happen in our times, not in distant centuries. Has no one bothered to go through my compilation? Must I spell it out in plain terms?
1. Daniil Andreev points out that there are several Antichrist candidates. Even though the scenario he saw concerning Stalin's return has been pushed back, Hitler himself returning alongside a penultimate Antichrist's plausible.
English: «It was only in the fourth century A.D. that it was finally accomplished, and Gagtungr succeeded in snatching a human monad from Iroln, a monad that at one time had had an incarnation as a Titan and was presently linked to a shelt [a person's whole being] that had just completed a journey in Enrof in the person of one of the Roman emperors.» (Perhaps Carinus or Diocletian?)
Regrettably, Daniil Andreev didn't say whether it was in the early or late 4th century. It's also unclear how recent the incarnation was.
Carus may be ruled out on account of his decisiveness in crushing the Sarmatians, which is remniscient of Alexander the Great's decision to subjugate the Grecians by force rather than placating them. It's arguably more humane to act quickly and be utterly ruthless than to draw out conflicts with peaceful measures, diplomacy, etc.
Carus was not struck to death for impiety, but rather «because he desired to pass beyond the bounds which Fate has set up.» decrees against going beyond certain borders exist in the Old Testament. Alexander and Hannibal likewise received similar warnings.
2. There was a successful attempt by Gagtungr, «Head of the Demons», to bring forth an incomplete Antichrist prematurely in the person of Justinian, who's not the same Roman emperor Andreev referred to.
3. In her memoirs, Leni Riefenstahl recounts her somnambulist experiences since she was a child. During WW2 she dreamt about the war with Russia and Germany's defeat. Once, her gaze met with a military officer who had chiseled features marked by scars. This was the second time she saw a vision play out before her eyes while awake, the first time was when she first heard Hitler speaking.
4. Jeanne Dixon's prophecies are dated from 2025 to the 2030s and are relevant for our times, she predicts China going down the path of conquest and Europe's war with Red China. Russia also enters into conflict with China. She predicts «In the 2030s a man who will have gained a reputation as a «peacemaker,» great in informational stature, and much admired, will emerge as the «war lord» of modern times.»
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/v496hh/my_dreams_of_the_future/
5. For over 15 years, a contemporary clairvoyant has been shown glimpses of a charismatic man who starts an empire in Western Europe: «The leader will be crowned roman emperor in paris (france and germany, the two uneven siblings, are united again)»
«People never see him eat or drink.» / Justinian «never took his fill of either food or drink,» (Prokopios)
6. Around the time of an antichrist candidate's enthronement, there's an unmistakeable sign: the arrival of a monstrous Comet. I have been researching this Comet, it causes the great earthquake described in St. John's Apocalypse (chapter 16). People die from sudden death from terror of its sight or are blinded from its light. This Comet was also seen around the time of Carus' death.
From the Russian Primary Chronicle:
Avecques Sol le Roy fort & puissant,
A Rheims & Aix sera receu & oingt,
Apres Conquestes meurtrira innocens. (C 4V86)
vn des horribles Roys temporels par ses adherans luy seront donnes telles louanges, qu'il aura plus respandu de sang humain des innocens Ecclesiastiques, que nul ne sçauroit auoir du vin. (Epistle to Henry II)
I'm posting it here so I can get around to asking him about his impressions of the Bahai Faith during his visit, in preparation for a mass-appeal to the Bahai, presenting The Rose of the World in a simplified manner to their English-speaking members. I'm not sure if I'm competent enough to present The Rose of the World, but I can easily/certainly demonstrate the compatibility between their ideals with the considerable knowledge at my disposal. The joint unification of The Rose of the World and Bahai Faith (or perhaps another religion such as Hinduism) will set the precedent for the unification of all religions.
They have admitted that only a Council could establish an universal language but what they don't realize is that the universal language their Prophet desired doesn't stop at merely using human speech. This is made clear to me by some of his hints:
«enable you to be independent of others» / «most firm foundation» / «strive to translate that which hath been written into reality and action»
There exists a deeper, underlying meaning to the «first sign» he speaks about. That's where The Rose of the World can make things clearer for them. There should also be a mathematical-scientific way of communicating facts, that does away with the need to memorize strange-sounding terms entirely, and eliminates repetition. DA: «so as to avoid constantly repeating a lengthy description» This is merely an early announcement. I plan to make my appeal in summertime.
The Bahai seem to be uncertain about whether the Light Hierarchy wishes for a «world government» or «world federation». That should be made clear to them, it is the latter. Even someone like Adolf Hitler understood this, in his own narrow and short-sighted way.
I am making the preparations to present/demonstrate the reality of The Rose of the World to English-speaking audiences, in a more systematic manner (by systematic, I mean simply laying down the truth/the facts as it is, without embellishments or exaggeration. Not in the manner university graduates and professors demand, with unnecessary exposition and contextual info about the author/writer. What matters is the content/essence of the message.)
This is untrue. This is an issue only for weak minds, who do not want to see or hear of it, who delight only in what's pleasurable, who indulge in revelries. The strong personalities, that is, «the righteous», have glimpsed the abyss and know that they are just as capable of the worst evil as the greatest good. Without knowing evil/what's harmful for us, how could we know what's good? The evil in existence drives us towards the Light. The denser the darkness the more valuable the Light becomes.Сосредоточенность на темной стороне мешает акцентировать внимание на светлом и том что зависит от нас, делать конкретные малые добрые дела.
Let's not forget that Daniil Andreev found it necessary to explore the darker aspects of existence: «For without a notion of the frightful and dread demonic sakwalas, we will also be unable to gain a proper notion of the higher layers of Shadanakar.»
_____
«Some succeed in convincing themselves that the danger is exaggerated.» (Daniil Andreev)Особенно для людей, которые не знакомы с серьезной мистикой и с Розой мира. Но с моей точки зрения вы сильно преувеличиваете ее значение в наши дни. Сосредоточенность.
It cannot be regarded as exaggeration because I provided the proof, facts and data for his existence. The only argument I made was that it could happen in our times, not in distant centuries. Has no one bothered to go through my compilation? Must I spell it out in plain terms?
1. Daniil Andreev points out that there are several Antichrist candidates. Even though the scenario he saw concerning Stalin's return has been pushed back, Hitler himself returning alongside a penultimate Antichrist's plausible.
English: «It was only in the fourth century A.D. that it was finally accomplished, and Gagtungr succeeded in snatching a human monad from Iroln, a monad that at one time had had an incarnation as a Titan and was presently linked to a shelt [a person's whole being] that had just completed a journey in Enrof in the person of one of the Roman emperors.» (Perhaps Carinus or Diocletian?)
Regrettably, Daniil Andreev didn't say whether it was in the early or late 4th century. It's also unclear how recent the incarnation was.
Carus may be ruled out on account of his decisiveness in crushing the Sarmatians, which is remniscient of Alexander the Great's decision to subjugate the Grecians by force rather than placating them. It's arguably more humane to act quickly and be utterly ruthless than to draw out conflicts with peaceful measures, diplomacy, etc.
Carus was not struck to death for impiety, but rather «because he desired to pass beyond the bounds which Fate has set up.» decrees against going beyond certain borders exist in the Old Testament. Alexander and Hannibal likewise received similar warnings.
2. There was a successful attempt by Gagtungr, «Head of the Demons», to bring forth an incomplete Antichrist prematurely in the person of Justinian, who's not the same Roman emperor Andreev referred to.
3. In her memoirs, Leni Riefenstahl recounts her somnambulist experiences since she was a child. During WW2 she dreamt about the war with Russia and Germany's defeat. Once, her gaze met with a military officer who had chiseled features marked by scars. This was the second time she saw a vision play out before her eyes while awake, the first time was when she first heard Hitler speaking.
4. Jeanne Dixon's prophecies are dated from 2025 to the 2030s and are relevant for our times, she predicts China going down the path of conquest and Europe's war with Red China. Russia also enters into conflict with China. She predicts «In the 2030s a man who will have gained a reputation as a «peacemaker,» great in informational stature, and much admired, will emerge as the «war lord» of modern times.»
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/v496hh/my_dreams_of_the_future/
5. For over 15 years, a contemporary clairvoyant has been shown glimpses of a charismatic man who starts an empire in Western Europe: «The leader will be crowned roman emperor in paris (france and germany, the two uneven siblings, are united again)»
«People never see him eat or drink.» / Justinian «never took his fill of either food or drink,» (Prokopios)
6. Around the time of an antichrist candidate's enthronement, there's an unmistakeable sign: the arrival of a monstrous Comet. I have been researching this Comet, it causes the great earthquake described in St. John's Apocalypse (chapter 16). People die from sudden death from terror of its sight or are blinded from its light. This Comet was also seen around the time of Carus' death.
From the Russian Primary Chronicle:
7. There's only two known seers in world history who stand out from the rest in the degree of exactitude, Nostradamus and Da Vinci. Both described in plain terms the shifting of the poles. Rose Stern claims to have worked at deciphering Nostradamus' texts for over 30 years, her research also points towards pole shift. I've begun inquiring into her works this week.Again it happened likewise in the reign of the Emperor Justinian that a star emitting rays appeared in the west. Men called it the brilliant star, and it shone forth for twenty days. Subsequently a shower of stars fell from evening till dawn, so that all thought that the stars of heaven were falling, and again the sun shone without light. This portent presaged rebellions and pestilences, and was fatal to mankind.
Avecques Sol le Roy fort & puissant,
A Rheims & Aix sera receu & oingt,
Apres Conquestes meurtrira innocens. (C 4V86)
vn des horribles Roys temporels par ses adherans luy seront donnes telles louanges, qu'il aura plus respandu de sang humain des innocens Ecclesiastiques, que nul ne sçauroit auoir du vin. (Epistle to Henry II)
Вложения
-
208.5 KB | Скачали: 3
-
240.2 KB | Скачали: 3
Редактирование: