I. Глава 1. Роза Мира и её ближайшие задачи
Максим,
We have seen how fiercely the Old Believers clung to their tradition and refused to conform to alien reforms as the Greeks did. I was told that they were defending themselves from an attempt from the outside to change their nature and they were asserting their right to be true to themselves. On the other hand, I think they went too far in opposing Peter the Great's reform and labelling him as the Antichrist, although Peter did make the fatal mistake of trying to turn Russians into something they're not.
The iconoclast Epiphanus of Salamis was once among the enlightened, before he went out from them and betrayed them, yet he had correctly observed,
So I guess my question now is: Is it permissable to append clarifying notes and provide alternative terms (in brackets or footnotes) to Andreev's passages? For instance, when he refers to nature spirits he calls them elementals, but he also claims that they merely occupy the space in the elements for creative play. In occultism, elementals can also refer to thought-forms which Andreev refers to as egregors. Confusion ensues whenever words carry multiple meanings and they're being used differently by various authors.
Another example: the concept of Ether as a substance in the air all around us is found in every civilization, but under a different name: Prana, Chi, Akasha, Pneuma, etc. The list is colossal. We need a more scientific designation rather than sticking with provisional name of agrungvilta-prana. Andreev himself noted, «we have yet to hear what science will call it in twenty or thirty years from now».
Btw I've attached insights from a friend's spiritual experiences worked up in the astral world. Perhaps he will help corroborate Andreev's revelation. He claims to have observed regions in that world being invaded (I've also heard about this from my clairvoyant friend Kate):
«Realm invasions generally take place when a number of beings from a lower realm
band together and attempt to invade a higher realm in order to gain more Vigour from
the higher aether energy levels. It does not mean a complete takeover of the realm, and is more generally just a region or area that is invaded.»
«Occasionally an invasion is also launched by higher beings against a lower realm, however this is small in scale, generally only 1 or 2 beings, with a specific target in mind, such as one who has insulted or attacked the higher being.»
Thanks for drawing this to my attention! I hadn't read it before. I regret not respecting his wishes. It makes total sense! Revelations must be dictated exactly as they were given or they will end up distorted. My Russian friend, Anthony, once told me, «Changing dictations is the worst thing you can do in the grand scheme of things... People are not allowed to rewrite dictations from heaven, and that they must be dictated as is directly and not changed.»Даниил Андреев просит ничего не менять в исходном тексте.
We have seen how fiercely the Old Believers clung to their tradition and refused to conform to alien reforms as the Greeks did. I was told that they were defending themselves from an attempt from the outside to change their nature and they were asserting their right to be true to themselves. On the other hand, I think they went too far in opposing Peter the Great's reform and labelling him as the Antichrist, although Peter did make the fatal mistake of trying to turn Russians into something they're not.
The iconoclast Epiphanus of Salamis was once among the enlightened, before he went out from them and betrayed them, yet he had correctly observed,
Such quote highlights the risk of exporting Roza Mira abroad. On the other hand, what grew up on Russian soil and was addressed to a Russian audience must be adapted for new hearers.«Since there had been a change in Israel's one religion, and the scripture of the Law had been transferred to other nations, the division of Israel's opinion also resulted. And then error arose, and discord began to sow seed from the one true religion in many counterfeit beliefs, as each individual thought best, and thought that he was proficient in the letter (of scripture) and could expound it to suit himself.»
So I guess my question now is: Is it permissable to append clarifying notes and provide alternative terms (in brackets or footnotes) to Andreev's passages? For instance, when he refers to nature spirits he calls them elementals, but he also claims that they merely occupy the space in the elements for creative play. In occultism, elementals can also refer to thought-forms which Andreev refers to as egregors. Confusion ensues whenever words carry multiple meanings and they're being used differently by various authors.
Another example: the concept of Ether as a substance in the air all around us is found in every civilization, but under a different name: Prana, Chi, Akasha, Pneuma, etc. The list is colossal. We need a more scientific designation rather than sticking with provisional name of agrungvilta-prana. Andreev himself noted, «we have yet to hear what science will call it in twenty or thirty years from now».
Btw I've attached insights from a friend's spiritual experiences worked up in the astral world. Perhaps he will help corroborate Andreev's revelation. He claims to have observed regions in that world being invaded (I've also heard about this from my clairvoyant friend Kate):
«Realm invasions generally take place when a number of beings from a lower realm
band together and attempt to invade a higher realm in order to gain more Vigour from
the higher aether energy levels. It does not mean a complete takeover of the realm, and is more generally just a region or area that is invaded.»
«Occasionally an invasion is also launched by higher beings against a lower realm, however this is small in scale, generally only 1 or 2 beings, with a specific target in mind, such as one who has insulted or attacked the higher being.»
Вложения
-
1.9 MB | Скачали: 51
Редактирование: