Книга, как я понимаю, Библия, или что-то другое?
Yes, obviously the Bible.
Ну, как раз некоторые реформы в Церкви необходимы, но это Богу решать. Его же Церковь...
Leaving it up to God, this is just a way of absolving one's self of responsibility. What does leave it up to God really mean? It means leave it to the hierocracies, priestly interpreters. It's the same expression Adolf Hitler used, he argued that matters of God should be left to the Church, while the Nazis focus more on earthly affairs. Although it's true that overeager reformers like Paul and Luther have done the most harm despite their good intentions. But if they had not acted, then something worse may have happened.
Вы признаёте, что Иисус Христос реально ходил по Галилее, и был какой-то действительной исторической Личностью, и в то же самое время эта Личность ещё была и выражением Логоса Шаданакара?
I do not know if he actually traversed in Galilee, I wasn't there to see his sojourn.
That Jesus was a
real historical figure is — to me — very
probable, considering:
•the benign effect his teachings have exerted on the world. Fanaticism alone couldn't have carried his message to the far ends of the earth.
•the uniqueness of his idea of salvaging the demonic and criminals, which was unknown to the ancient peoples. This prompted Goethe to proclaim Christianity as the final religion, that could never be eliminated from mankind.
•that some unknown writers would go so far as to preserve his memory and transmit it to posterity.
•the effect the likeness of his image has on people. Philippe Nizier once said, «Quand, en regardant une image du Christ, on sent au cśur une certaine chaleur, c’estque cette image possède une certaine ressemblance.»
•his psychological insight into the mentality of the Jews, who haven't changed since then
•slander/calumny heaped against him by the Jews, who behave as the Pharisees once did
•the agreement between Daniil Andreev and Philippe Nizier on his early years, they both claimed he traveled at age 14. Nizier had claimed to have been with Jesus or his apostles, yet he never claimed to have been any of the apostles.
However, I do not believe that Jesus «walked Galilee» in the early 1st century, during a time of unrest, uprisings, upheavals. Before 1 AD, there was a period of religious revival, Jewish miracle-workers came out into the open. Who do you suppose united the mystics, kabbalists, Magi/Chaldeans, etc.? Throughout Luke 1-2, there's descriptions of people, who had already known about the birth of Christ.
Also, I do not deny that Jesus was born as a Jew by bloodline. St. Nilus the Myrrgusher makes the most compelling case for Jesus' Jewish ancestry, that He was sent to adorn their race with one of the greatest individuals who ever lived, he says because they're the most ungrateful of all peoples. In other words, there were karmic reasons for him being sent to them. It's kind of like when Andreev had pointed out how instead of the Indians receiving Gandhi, a nationalist tyrant could have stepped up in his place.
тогда, где Она сейчас, эта Личность-Проявление? в 2025?
We know that Christ promised to remain with mankind, even to the end of the cycle/epoch. Christ did not experience death, he left the body of Jesus before it suffered injury/death. Considering what we know about the world of nature spirits, it's very probable that Christ still has his etheric body intact and he can temporarily assume a physical form in Enrof. It's also very likely he will appear as a non-white, non-Jewish male and that few people will recognize him when he makes himself known to the world. Even if the Antichrist had failed to manifest, would Christ still be recognized if he returned? As for why he would return as a non-white, non-Jewish male, the fact is, that the greatest apostasy from Christian principles has been racism/racial antipathy. He can only come after the world has been set in order, not in the midst of its chaos, thus he sends a messenger before him to clear the way for his return. This messenger can only be someone who belongs to none of the three Abrahamic faiths yet knows their laws inside and out.
According to St. Nilus the Myrrgusher, who has foreseen the eight ecumenical council, the founding of a monastic order, a long night of robbery (that is, the decades after Antichrist's demise), Christ's future descent into the purgatories, possible allusions to Zventa-Sventana, and who's provided more specific details about the Antichrist's seal than any prophet before him:
Это значит сие: когда царь захочет пойти в какое малое и низшее село, то посылает вперед чиновных своих, чтобы уготовали путь, то есть подмели бы. Говорим: чтобы покаялись, обратились, очистились, сиречь, исповедались и просветились. Спрашиваю я вас: если место плохое, то можно ли ввести царя в него? Ради того и послал Он сановника Своего, говорим: Предтечу, — дабы уготовал он путь Господень. Итак, село есть человек; презренное есть преступление. Посему и уподобляю я его селу тому.
Note: The attached pdf was hastily prepared, I'm still working on refining the translation and organizing its contents.
Кому сказать спасибо за искупление человечества от греха, за Крестную Жертву, за обетованного Параклета?
